Thursday, 25 June 2015

poverty in Afghanistan

Poverty: Understand absolute and relative poverty in Afghanistan.


  The discussions and group work in class about the poverty. Condition where people's basic needs for food, clothing, and shelter are not being met. Poverty is generally of two types: (1) Absolute poverty is synonymous with destitution and occurs when people cannot obtain adequate resources (measured in terms of calories or nutrition) to support a minimum level of physical health. Absolute poverty means about the same everywhere, and can be eradicated as demonstrated by some countries. (2) Relative poverty occurs when people do not enjoy a certain minimum level of living standards as determined by a government (and enjoyed by the bulk of the population) that vary from country to country, sometimes within the same country. Relative poverty occurs everywhere, is said to be increasing, and may never be eradicated.


       The war in Afghanistan — preceded by decades of conflict — has had a profound impact on many families. Insurgent attacks, complex international governance and enduring poverty have made life in Afghanistan particularly challenging for millions of children. Many families who fled the country in earlier years have gradually returned to Afghanistan, but are greeted with poor infrastructure, including a lack of health-care facilities, substandard sanitation and not enough clean water. Data from the World Bank suggests that 36 percent of Afghans live in poverty — more than 9 million people — but that figure may be higher because of a lack of representative data from Afghan households. Families at risk of falling below poverty guidelines face an uncertain future, as many factors could affect their ability to provide for their children.

         Afghanistan is one of the most impoverished nations in Asia. With 36% of its population living below the poverty line, Afghanistan is only second to Bangladesh as Asia’s poorest country. Poverty is most heavily concentrated in the rural areas of Afghanistan. While 90% of urban households have access to electricity, only 29% of rural households do. Additionally, 58% of urban households have access to safe water, but only 19% of rural homes do. Illiteracy is also most prevalent in rural areas. The province of Paktia, a rural province located on Afghanistan’s south border, has an illiteracy rate of 73%. Most of its jobs are concentrated in agriculture, with 71% of all employment found in that sector. Its poverty rate stands at 76%. The lowest rates of poverty occur in Afghanistan’s urban areas. The province of Kabul has a poverty rate of 29% while 36% of Afghans in rural areas and 54% of nomadic Afghans live in poverty. The World Bank has found that “the higher the human capital endowment of the household head, the lower the risk for the household to be poor.” Thus, those who live in rural areas in Afghanistan and have less access to education have a higher risk of living in poverty. To address the problem of poverty, Afghanistan must improve school enrollment rates. Only a minority of children are enrolled in primary school in Afghanistan. A meager 36% of the poorest Afghans attend primary school, while 46% of the richest Afghans do. Additionally, 43% of boys are enrolled in primary school, while only 31% of girls are. The effects of the lower school attendance rates of females are evident in women’s literacy rates in Afghanistan. In seven of Afghanistan’s 34 provinces, the female literacy rate is 1%. Even in Afghanistan’s most educated province of Kabul, where the overall literacy rate is 47%, the female literacy reaches only 30% ?

         These statistics suggest that poverty reduction programs in Afghanistan can begin by focusing on improving the education of all Afghans while also closing the gender gap that is seen in school enrollment. In order for more Afghans to be lifted out of poverty, they must have improved access to education. With better education, Afghans will have better opportunities to earn a higher income and lift themselves out of poverty.

         I think it is useful to improve my insight in the future.


References :-
Business Dictionary, Poverty.

Child fund, Beyond the War: Poverty in Afghanistan.












Sunday, 21 June 2015

I ‘was’ a neo-classical economist- until I study the AIT-GDS ‘development’ economics a few days ago. The most astonishing fact that I came to learn in this class is that economic growth and economic development are two separate concepts. Economic growth means how much a country becomes wealthier, often measured by GDP per capita. In contrast, economic development refers to non-monetary wealth, widely assessed by Human Development Index.

In the class, I was part of explaining the GDP annual growth in my country, Afghanistan. Analysis in economic growth directs to discuss some exogenous factors like security having affected the economic growth. For example, security deterioration led a sharp drop in economic growth in 2009. But it revamped significantly thanks to a bumper harvest in 2012 (World Bank, 2013). But it did not entirely inform me of outside the macroeconomics. Contrary to it, the concept of human development points out that economic growth does not provide any guarantee for each of us (Gasper & Truong, 2005). This is intuitively right according to my observation.

Let’s say, I take human development perspectives in understanding about the education system. According to Human Development Report (UNDP, 2004), education has been one of the top priorities for the Afghan government, sparing the second largest budget. It is necessary to rebuild the country after as a three decade-long devastating conflict destroyed the education system nation-widely. But human development concept alerts me that while the national economic wealth is committed to education sector, people’s actual benefits are different from person to person. For example, only 20 % of women aged 15-24 are literate still now in 2013, and it is one of the sluggish areas of progress though prioritised (Oates, 2013). If you are a girl in rural area, the rate gets three times lower. Such disparity may not come exclusively from gender or geography, but also from other factors. Here the concept of human development reminds that the mass description, like ‘people’, or ‘national’ could be far from a reality for some. If you are a rural girl in Afghanistan, neither economic drop in 2009 nor rise in 2012 in the earlier analysis illustrates your situation well. You are most likely not to have been benefited.









I am not against the use of GDP annual growth for a macro-level discussion. But without being constantly conscious about who gets how much out of it, referring to human development concept, no economists can deliver the actual benefits to people in need. Now, I should aim to be a ‘developmental’ economist!!




Gasper, D., & Truong, T.-D. (2005). Deepening Development Ethics: From Economism to Human Development to Human Security. The European Journal of Development Research, 17(3), 372–384.
Oates, L. (2013) The mother of all problems: female literacy in Afghanistan. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/global-development-professionals-network/2013/jun/21/funding-education-in-afghanistan
UNDP. (2004). Human Development Report Afghanistan.
World Bank. (2013). October 2013 Afghanistan Economic Update.